Whitestone Boulevard Commercial Rezoning and Land Use Amendment
Cedar Park
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 0
- Importance
- 61
Declining — less community discussion. 0 comments in the last 30 days.
Public comments (9)
Expressed concern about parkland disposition and floodplain risks in the Breakaway area.
Planning & Zoning Commission — Planning & Zoning Commission · 3:30 →Voiced opposition to development near detention ponds that could increase flood risks for neighbors.
Planning & Zoning Commission — Planning & Zoning Commission · 7:13 →Shared concerns about neighborhood character, lack of notice, traffic on Lone Star Drive, and potential noise and trash from commercial buildings.
Planning & Zoning Commission — Planning & Zoning Commission · 27:13 →Expressed opposition to revisiting the commercial rezoning idea after residents already made their opposition clear.
Planning & Zoning Commission — Planning & Zoning Commission · 30:22 →Stated opposition to updating the future land use plan and rezoning property along Lone Star Drive.
Planning & Zoning Commission — Planning & Zoning Commission · 31:04 →Expressed opposition to changing the future land use and zoning designations.
Planning & Zoning Commission — Planning & Zoning Commission · 31:42 →Objected to commercial development touching Lone Star Drive, pointing out a lack of signage and potential impacts from commercial access.
Planning & Zoning Commission — Planning & Zoning Commission · 32:06 →Strongly opposed regional commercial designation and big box retail next to residential lots, citing severe drainage issues, substandard roads, and pedestrian safety.
Planning & Zoning Commission — Planning & Zoning Commission · 35:56 →Speaking as Thousand Oaks HOA president, urged the commission to deny the regional commercial designation and rezoning to protect existing neighborhoods from increased intensity and traffic.
Planning & Zoning Commission — Planning & Zoning Commission · 42:57 →